[Bug 2391313] Review Request: bazaar - A flatpak centered app store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391313



--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Initial spec review:

> Name:           bazaar

I would prefer this package to be named "bazaar-store" simply to avoid
confusion with the Bazaar VCS. This is not a firm requirement, but it also
simplifies things if you're not reusing an existing package name (no
unretirement process required).

> Summary:        A flatpak centered app store

The summary can be tightened up a bit to follow rpmlint guidelines:
"Flatpak-centric software center and app store"

> Source0:        %{url}/archive/refs/tags/v%{version}.tar.gz

The SourceURL should be reformulated as
"%{url}/archive/v%{version}/bazaar-%{version}.tar.gz"

Cf.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_git_tags

> # https://github.com/kolunmi/bazaar/pull/275
> Patch:          275.patch

This should be restructured to use a URL for the Patch line, and the comment
should explain what the patch is for

> Requires:       glycin-libs
> Requires:       libadwaita
> Requires:       libsoup3
> Requires:       json-glib

What are these for? It looks like RPM already generates the required
dependencies, so these should be dropped.

> %description
> A new app store for GNOME with a focus on discovering and installing applications and add-ons from Flatpak remotes, particularly Flathub.
> It emphasizes supporting the developers who make the Linux desktop possible.
> Bazaar features a "curated" tab that can be configured by distributors to allow for a more locallized experience.

This needs to be wrapped to 79 columns.

> %build
> %meson
> %meson_build

The "%meson" call should be split into the "%conf" section unless you plan to
ship it in EPEL < 10.

See this as an example:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/waynergy/blob/rawhide/f/waynergy.spec

> %changelog
> * Wed Aug 27 2025 Kyle Gospodnetich <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> - Init package

Changelog format is not quite right and needs version-release mentioned
somewhere.

Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/manual-changelog/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391313

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202391313%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux