[Bug 2392738] Review Request: aff4-cpp-lite - Advanced Forensic Format version 4 library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392738

Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://github.com/aff4/aff
                   |                            |4-cpp-lite



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9516899
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2392738-aff4-cpp-lite/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09516899-aff4-cpp-lite/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- aff4-cpp-lite : /usr/include/aff4/AFF4Containers.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/AFF4Defaults.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/AFF4Lexicon.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/IAFF4Container.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/IAFF4Image.h aff4-cpp-lite : /usr/include/aff4/IAFF4Map.h
aff4-cpp-lite : /usr/include/aff4/IAFF4Resolver.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/IAFF4Resource.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/IAFF4Stream.h aff4-cpp-lite : /usr/include/aff4/RDFValue.h
aff4-cpp-lite : /usr/include/aff4/aff4-c.h aff4-cpp-lite :
/usr/include/aff4/aff4.h 
  Read more:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
- Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  Read more:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
- License file COPYING is not marked as %license
  Read more:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Package has .a files: aff4-cpp-lite. Illegal package name: aff4-cpp-lite.
Does not provide -static: aff4-cpp-lite.
  Read more:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392738

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202392738%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux