https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302630 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(pemensik@redhat.c | |om) CC| |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #11 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #10) > Though whether packaging something where the project is untouched for 4+ > years and the maintainer barely active is a good idea is a question left to > the reader. It looks like tagptr is a hard dependency for moka, which is a hard dependency for the latest release of hickory-resolver, so it seems we will have no choice but to package this one way or the other. Petr, do you want to submit an updated package with the necessary license text patched in, or should I start a new review request and close this one? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302630 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202302630%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
