https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387518 --- Comment #15 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks. Dynamic linking is certainly better. (In reply to Christian Hergert from comment #4) > * "foundry" CLI tool (which statically links libfoundry) > * "libfoundry" and "libfoundry-devel" which is just the core API (e.g. no > GTK integration) > * "libfoundry-gtk" and "libfoundry-gtk-devel" which is the GTK integration Looks like we still need to implement this subpackage split. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387518 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202387518%23c15 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
