[Bug 2376217] Review Request: openbao - A tool for securely accessing secrets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217



--- Comment #20 from Dave Dykstra <dwd@xxxxxxx> ---
It will be easy enough to apply a patch this time because the el8/9/10 version
is almost up to date currently, plus it turns out that the update to the
released version of go required by openbao was updated from the el8/9/10
version very shortly before the release.  I will go ahead and make that change.
 I will also try to persuade the openbao project to slow down its updates of
required go version.

However, I'm not sure this is a sustainable approach given the speed at which
golang is updated upstream vs when it is updated in el8/9/10.  The latter often
for months ships versions that are no longer supported by upstream golang.
Recent versions of go also insert their version into go.mod more frequently
than they used to, so dependencies are frequently requiring newer versions of
go. I am the release manager of apptainer and I work hard there to avoid
requiring a version of golang newer than el8/9/10 supplies, and I often have to
defer dependabot updates for many months when dependencies require newer
versions.  So I have first hand experience with this situation and so far have
not run into any high severity security updates in dependencies that make an
update urgent, but I don't expect that will always be the case.  

I have not found this policy in the Fedora golang packaging guidelines; please
point me to it if I missed it. Also please tell me if it has been specifically
debated, and if not tell me how I can raise the issue for debate.  The go
source code tarball is not that big, only 30M, and the language is so efficient
that it can fully rebuild itself using an older version compiler in just a few
minutes, so I don't understand why this has to be a MUST requirement.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202376217%23c20

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux