https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2381956 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #1) > I notice the VCS URL in both packages is "git:https://...";. I suppose we > don't > use this for anything, but unclear if that's correct or not. I believe it matches the description of that tag here: https://rpm.org/docs/4.19.x/manual/tags.html, in the table named "Informative package tags". As you say, nothing seems to actually use it. It's just to convey information to humans looking at a package, I think. (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #2) > Ocaml: > [x]: This should never happen One of these days I'm going to figure out why fedora-review does this. > The undefined-non-weak-symbol errors are strange, but if the package > works then it works. It could be a problem in rpmlint or a > peculiarity of OCaml. The latter, I think. Some of those symbols are provided by the OCaml runtime, others by ocaml-cmdliner. OCaml loads the dependencies first, so all symbols should be defined when crowbar.cmxs is loaded. Thank you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2381956 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202381956%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
