[Bug 2374723] Review Request: mpd - Music player daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2374723



--- Comment #4 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Replace

> %global  mpd_rundir          /run/mpd

> with

> %global  mpd_rundir          %{_rundir}/mpd

Done

>> License:        GPL-2.0-only AND BSD-2-Clause AND ISC AND LGPL-2.1-only

> 1. Licensing break-down is missing. The following licenses are not listed:

> ./src/pcm/Dsd2Pcm.cxx: BSD-2-Clause-Views
> ./src/pcm/Dsd2Pcm.hxx: BSD-2-Clause-Views
> ./src/pcm/ReplayGainAnalyzer.cxx: LGPL-2.1-or-later
> ./src/pcm/ReplayGainAnalyzer.hxx: LGPL-2.1-or-later

Fixed

>> # Note that the 0.18.x branch doesn't yet work with Fedora's version of
>> # libmpcdec which needs updating.
>> # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014468
>> # http://bugs.musicpd.org/view.php?id=3814#bugnotes

> 2. Given that this is version 0.24, are the above comments still relevant? bug 1014468 is long closed.

Fixed

>> Patch0:         mpd-0.24-mpdconf.patch
>> Patch1:         mpd-0.24-remove_NoNewPrivileges.patch
>> Patch2:         timidity_path.patch

> 3. Patches should have either upstream bug or PR references or a comment why they're downstream only.

Added comments.

> 4. Please sort BuildRequires: alphabetically. Most of them could be converted to pkgconfig() style, too.

Sorted alphabetically. Why is pkgconfig() style preferable?

spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/mpd.spec
srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/mpd-0.24.4-3.fc43.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2374723

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202374723%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux