https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Understood. Do I list each license on a separate line? Putting multiple "License: XXX" tags on a single package is invalid and will cause rpmbuild to refuse to build the package and exit with an error, so the licences must all go in a single "License: XXX and YYY..." tag. (Unless you're building multiple packages from the same spec file, in which case each sub-package can have a different licence tag.) That being said, standard practice is to also put a comment explaining the licensing breakdown. You should end up with something like: # Most of the code is subject to license XXX. # - src/linked_list.c is licensed under YYY # Statically linked library "qwerty" is ZZZ. License: XXX and YYY and ZZZ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202379721%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
