https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2374290 --- Comment #3 from andreyesquivel.dev@xxxxxxxxx --- That makes sense. The 1.5.0 tag does appear rushed and ambiguous with that leftover AC_INIT reference. It is not worth switching to an upstream that’s not clearly active or finalized in its releases. I now understood about the warnings. The code is not security-sensitive, it makes sense to proceed while documenting the issues, as did. Thank you for your response. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2374290 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202374290%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
