[Bug 2358954] Review Request: rust-yaml-rust2 - Fully YAML 1.2 compliant YAML parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358954

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #21 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Thank you for your work, this looks good now! Some last comments and one
non-blocking suggestion included below, but the package is APPROVED.

---

> Update to 0.10.3 which fixed the license and bundling. I can actually make the yaml-test-suite work, but I will tackle that later after conference season is over. Any objections for adding a Source2 with the git archive of yaml-test-suite later on?

No, I have no objections to that, it sounds like a good solution all around.
You'll even only need to unpack those sources in %check so there's no way they
could even get installed as part of the built packages.

---

Note that the statement in the LICENSE file is now inaccurate (it's only "MIT
OR Apache-2.0" now, not "either only MIT or MIT AND Apache-2.0"), but at least
the package is correct now and we will ignore that statement in the LICENSE
file because we know it's wrong ;)

---

Last suggestion (but this is not blocking the review):

Shipping "hidden" files / folders is usually frowned upon in packaging. I would
recommend that you replace

> install -Dp .licenses/* -t %{buildroot}%{crate_instdir}/.licenses

after %cargo_install with something like

> mv .licenses/* ./ && rmdir .licenses

*before* %cargo_install, and list the files as just %license
"%{crate_instdir}/LICENSE-Apache" and "%{crate_instdir}/LICENSE-MIT".

You can even do both in rust2rpm.toml by setting `package.license-files =
["LICENSE-Apache", "LICENSE-MIT"]` and putting the pre-%cargo_install steps
into the `scripts.install.pre` setting.

---

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

✅ package contains only permissible content
✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass
✅ latest version of the crate is packaged
✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora
✅ license files are included with %license in %files
✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358954

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202358954%23c21

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux