https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360119 --- Comment #20 from Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > d) W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > {/usr/bin/generate-boot-csv,/usr/bin/uefi-boot-menu) /lib64/libudev.so.1 > > Not sure why this is happening - do those subprojects have a dependency on > the udev bindings but don't actually use them? > But this might be a harmless warning in either case. libefi has a module which uses udev. Both binaries use the library but not the module. Apparently rust links in libudev nevertheless. > Alternatively, now that all the dependencies needed are present, why not > drop the conditionals for "do not build_efi_apps" entirely? It doesn't build on ppc and s390 ... > 5. It's a bit strange to see architecture-dependent executables getting > installed under /usr/share ? > It might be OK to do this for EFI executables since they're not meant to be > executed on the host OS (I assume), but it's still ... weird. Just making > sure this is intentional. It's common practice for firmware. edk2-ovmf.rpm places firmware images and efi binaries in /usr/share/edk2/ovmf too. I've also moved the efi binaries to a noarch sub-rpm, to allow installing it on non-native archs and run the efi apps in qemu (again following common packaging practice for firmware). spec url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/kraxel/rust.misc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09121431-virt-firmware-rs/virt-firmware-rs.spec srpm url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/kraxel/rust.misc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09121431-virt-firmware-rs/virt-firmware-rs-25.5.1-1.fc43.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360119 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202360119%23c20 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
