[Bug 2369375] Review Request: clapper-enhancers - Plugins enhancing Clapper library capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369375



--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #2)
> I think you need to byte-compile the Python files. Otherwise, this looks
> fine. Details below:

You're absolutely correct. Thanks for catching that!

> Package Review
> ==============
[...] 
> The manual dependency on libpeas-loader-python%{_isa} is reasonable since it
> apparently cannot be generated; I’m assuming that there is an indirect
> dlopen()/ctypes involved at some point in the chain. The comment justifying
> it
> (“required by yt-dlp enhancer”) could be more detailed, but is adequate.

It segfaults (inside libpeas.so) otherwise. Not sure if it's a bug.

> Similarly, the manual dependency on python3dist(yt-dlp) is reasonable given
> that this is not a Python library package and there is no .dist-info
> directory
> for the Python code it ships (so there can be no Python dependency metadata).
> 
> ===== Issues =====
> 
> - Given that the Python sources in the plugins are used by importing them
>   rather than by executing them as scripts, they must be bytecode-compiled.

Will do, thanks for the detailed steps.

[...]
>   I opened https://github.com/Rafostar/clapper-enhancers/pull/15 to fix this
>   upstream. No change is required in the package submission: I don’t
> recommend
>   patching this downstream, especially before upstream reviews my PR.

Thanks!

(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3)
> Oh, one more thing! Please replace
> 
>   %global _clapperenhdir /usr/lib64/clapper-0.0/enhancers
> 
> with
> 
>   %global _clapperenhdir %{_libdir}/clapper-0.0/enhancers

Sure! I can't believe I missed this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369375

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202369375%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux