https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369464 --- Comment #11 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I prepared an updated submission with the WTFNMFPL-licensed tutorial scripts filtered out of the source archive while that license awaits legal review. New Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20250602/python-pyscipopt.spec New SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20250602/python-pyscipopt-5.5.0-1.fc42.src.rpm Assuming the license is approved in https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/663 and is eventually assigned the SPDX identifier WTFNMFPL, then at that time, I will go back to using the unfiltered source archive, and the license-related portions of the spec file will look like this: # The entire source is MIT, except examples/tutorial/even.py and # examples/tutorial/logical.py, which are WTFNMFPL, and which are # packaged only in the examples subpackage. License: MIT AND WTFNMFPL […] %package -n python3-pyscipopt Summary: %{summary} License: MIT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369464 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202369464%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
