https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366921 --- Comment #13 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jannik Müller from comment #12) > Should I do write a package review for that now? I didn't think it would > explode this far with so many packages I have to submit. I just want to fix > Hyprland right now, so that the Fedora users can enjoy the newest version > again. I don't know if I have the time to maintain more packages. > Although it might be necessary... I hacked together a quick proof of concept, as follows: - https://music.fedorapeople.org/openalgz-ut.spec - https://music.fedorapeople.org/openalgz-ut-0.0.5-1.fc42.src.rpm Then I tried to unbundle with BuildRequires: openalgz-ut and in %prep # Adjust dependency name in tests to match Fedora’s openalgz-ut package. sed -r -i 's/\but::(ut)\b/\1/' tests/CMakeLists.txt After that, things still weren’t quite right: cd /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/redhat-linux-build/tests/compare_test && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/compare_test.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lut: No such file or directory (At the same time, in a different parallel process, I did see the GCC 15 incompatibility you reported, “static assertion failed: hash function must be copy constructible.”) So the CMake configs are trying to have it link a nonexistent libut.so for a header-only library. I also don’t like that my proposed openalgz-ut package Provides cmake(ut) rather than cmake(ut::ut), and that this is the same Provides as ut-devel. I didn’t have the time or interest to investigate any of this further. You are welcome to take my links above as a starting point and try to get everything working properly, if you like. I think unbundling (openalgz-ut) here is less urgent since it’s only used for tests and isn’t installed as part of the binary RPMs, so if you can get glaze working with a bundled copy provided as an additional source, I think that would be reasonable too. For the time being, I guess it could also be ok to build this without the tests in Fedora 42+ due to the GCC 15 issue, as long as you are sure it works with hyprland, although I defer to Benson as the actual reviewer here. It would be nice to at least prove it out with tests in a Fedora 41 scratch build, where you have GCC 14, to show that the GCC 15 regression is the only problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366921 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202366921%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
