https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366921 --- Comment #8 from Jannik Müller <nighti@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I tried as far as I could, unforunately Dragonbox is from the upstream source. The developer of Dragonbox hasn't released a new update in the last 3 years while the upstream source has been edited 7 months ago. glaze uses the version from 7 months ago, therefore the system library is missing definitions that are required for glaze. I was able to include xxhash64ct and fast_float as system libraries. Even without the above changed, enabling tests causes the build to fail: [ 5%] Building CXX object tests/cli_menu_test/CMakeFiles/cli_menu_test.dir/cli_menu_test.cpp.o cd /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/redhat-linux-build/tests/cli_menu_test && /usr/bin/g++ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/include -isystem /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/external/ut/include -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -std=gnu++23 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -Wno-missing-braces -MD -MT tests/cli_menu_test/CMakeFiles/cli_menu_test.dir/cli_menu_test.cpp.o -MF CMakeFiles/cli_menu_test.dir/cli_menu_test.cpp.o.d -o CMakeFiles/cli_menu_test.dir/cli_menu_test.cpp.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/tests/cli_menu_test/cli_menu_test.cpp In file included from /usr/include/c++/15/bits/unordered_map.h:33, from /usr/include/c++/15/unordered_map:43, from /usr/include/c++/15/functional:65, from /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/include/glaze/api/api.hpp:6, from /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/include/glaze/api/impl.hpp:6, from /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/tests/api_test/api_test.cpp:7: /usr/include/c++/15/bits/hashtable.h: In instantiation of ‘class std::_Hashtable<std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >, std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >, std::__detail::_Identity, std::equal_to<std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >, std::hash<std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, true, true> >’: /usr/include/c++/15/bits/unordered_set.h:110:18: required from ‘class std::unordered_set<std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >’ 110 | _Hashtable _M_h; | ^~~~ /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/include/glaze/core/meta.hpp:226:45: required from ‘constexpr const std::string_view glz::name_v<std::unordered_set<std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > > >’ 226 | if constexpr (requires { T::glaze::name; }) { | ^~~~ /builddir/build/BUILD/glaze-5.2.1-build/glaze-5.2.1/tests/api_test/api_test.cpp:180:36: required from here 180 | std::string_view u = glz::name_v<std::unordered_set<std::vector<std::string>>>; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/15/bits/hashtable.h:210:51: error: static assertion failed: hash function must be copy constructible 210 | static_assert(is_copy_constructible<_Hash>::value, | ^~~~~ /usr/include/c++/15/bits/hashtable.h:210:51: note: ‘std::integral_constant<bool, false>::value’ evaluates to false It seems to be that the test uses a template which creates a realization that is not allowed in the cpp library. I would create an issue on upstream, but would suggest disabling the tests that are defective until upstream fixes it. I need the library to update Hyprland. Hyprland doesn't seem to use the broken features that are used in the test. Do you agree with me? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366921 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202366921%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
