[Bug 2362051] Review Request: rust-sccache - Ccache-like tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362051



--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
The FIXME for 1) said to use the output of "%cargo_license_summary", which is:

# (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause
# (MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016
# 0BSD OR MIT OR Apache-2.0
# Apache-2.0
# Apache-2.0 AND ISC AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)
# Apache-2.0 OR Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
# Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0
# Apache-2.0 OR ISC OR MIT
# Apache-2.0 OR MIT
# Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT
# BSD-2-Clause
# BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT
# BSD-3-Clause
# CDLA-Permissive-2.0
# ISC
# MIT
# MIT OR Apache-2.0
# MIT OR Zlib OR Apache-2.0
# MIT-0 OR Apache-2.0
# MPL-2.0
# Unicode-3.0
# Unlicense OR MIT
# Zlib

These all need to be covered by the License tag. It currently only lists:

> # src/lru_disk_cache/lru_cache.rs is Apache-2.0 OR MIT
> License:        Apache-2.0 OR MIT

Which should be the comment and change for the License tag for the *source
package* (line 15) not the *built package* (line 45), and it should be
something like this instead (just "Apache-2.0 OR MIT" is wrong in this
situation):

> # most of sccache is Apache-2.0 except for
> # src/lru_disk_cache/lru_cache.rs which is Apache-2.0 OR MIT
> License: Apache-2.0 AND (Apache-2.0 OR MIT)

Also, part of the patch for Cargo.toml that doesn't touch the default features
now should be droppable since you no longer ship the "-devel" subpackages, but
that's not a blocker, just a possible simplification for the future that can be
done after the review is done.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362051

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202362051%23c8

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux