[Bug 2358954] Review Request: rust-yaml-rust2 - Fully YAML 1.2 compliant YAML parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358954



--- Comment #16 from Cristian Le <fedora@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #14)
> 0. The upstream license expression is wrong, it's "MIT OR (MIT AND
> Apache-2.0)" whereas it should be "MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)".

My bad, I was the one who suggested the former. Isn't it equivalent in some
sense? But yeah, it would affect the concatenation I suppose.

> 1. Since you exclude yaml-test-suite from the built packages, the license
> tag should be just "MIT OR Apache-2.0" since no MIT-only contents end up in
> the built package. This needs to be patched in Cargo.toml too so the "wrong"
> expression doesn't affect the %cargo_license{,_summary} macros.

Well, this is the confusion, is `license` the license of the crate or the
artifacts? If it's the former, then isn't theirs as `MIT AND (MIT OR
Apache-2.0)` correct, and in our case different because we don't propagate?

> Alternatively, the upstream project could just exclude the yaml-test-suite stuff from published crates, that would eliminate the license expression issue entirely

It would limit our ability to run those tests if they fix the `libtest-mimic`
dependency issue. It does seem like a good test suite to cover, but it might be
sufficient to be covered downstream only? I am not sure which way I am leaning
on this one.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358954

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202358954%23c16

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux