[Bug 2364345] Review Request: rust-udisks2 - Unofficial crate for interacting with the UDisks2 API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364345



--- Comment #9 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #7)
> It looks like you patched the license file correctly, but now that upstream
> has responded to your PR, it would probably be better to patch in what was
> actually merged,
> https://github.com/FineFindus/udisks-rs/commit/
> 6359a37560f3bbeaab2b8d79ddec245cad9ec08b.

In
https://github.com/FineFindus/udisks-rs/commit/6359a37560f3bbeaab2b8d79ddec245cad9ec08b,
upstream corrected the license to LGPL-2.0-or-later, not LGPL-2.1-or-later, and
patched the LICENSE file to be the LGPL 2.0 text. Upstream explicitly reported
that this is consistent with udisks2 licensing and that LGPL-2.0-or-later is
their intent. This is also consistent with “either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version” in the XML file.

The latest submission still corresponds to the PR, not to what upstream
actually committed. Could you please set License to LGPL-2.0-or-later instead
of LGPL-2.1-or-later, and apply the same LICENSE-file patch that upstream did,
since it seems clear that the LGPL-2.1 metadata was an error?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364345

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202364345%23c9

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux