https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2350109 --- Comment #51 from Pramod V U <pramodvu1502@xxxxxxxxx> --- PR: https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/pull/171 It improves a few things not directly related to the generator: - Honours the "%{_presetdir}" macro (./configure itself and the Makefile too) - Preset file is already included now in the repo - spec-file is in the repo, retrievable without a "custom script" in the copr... - Other things not directly related to that. Yes, the spec-file mustn't be the problem of upstream, but the copr... In the copr web interface, I can in the "Builds" section skip all of this and directly link/upload the spec-file, but the "Packages" section... For now I have "Packages" section to be the older version, am directly uploading the newer specfiles for "Build". Is this fine? If yes then upstream needn't be worried about the specfile at all... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2350109 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202350109%23c51 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
