https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364403 --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- There are quite a lot of complaints on duplicated files in generated libdmrconf-doc package, which is even 100MB large and architecture specific. It might be reduced by removing duplicate and replacing it with symlink. fdupes -r rpms-unpacked/libdmrconf-doc-0.12.1-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm/ -m 922 duplicate files (in 922 sets), occupying 2.8 megabytes rpmlint creates a lot of warnings about it, might be worth solving by after-process somehow. But their size does not seem significant. libdmrconf-doc.x86_64: E: no-binary libdmrconf-doc.x86_64: E: files-duplicated-waste 2826520 If possible, common data should be in noarch doc package. If there are any differences, those might be part of devel package. I expect just few files might be arch-dependent, if any. Requires: libdmrconf{?_isa} = %{version} I think also release should be included in above Requires for %package -n libdmrconf-doc and %package devel. Common usage is %{version}-%{release}, is there any secific reason why is not release included? There are few unowned directories: [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d, /usr/lib/udev, /usr/share/doc/libdmrconf Depending on systemd-udev should fix first 2, %files -n libdmrconf-doc should own directory without html too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364403 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202364403%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
