https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297701 Frantisek Sumsal <frantisek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2025-04-25 12:58:50 --- Comment #7 from Frantisek Sumsal <frantisek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > I would like to know why we would want this library in Fedora. My intention with this was to provide a replacement for the (now EOLed) botan2 library, so we don't end up with software using an out-of-date crypto library in Fedora - no clue if the software in question can be reworked to use other crypto libraries. Unfortunately, I don't really have time to pursue this further anymore, so I'll go ahead and close this (and many thanks to Jeremy for the, now unfortunately wasted review). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297701 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202297701%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
