[Bug 2357266] Review Request: snapm - snapshot manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357266



--- Comment #25 from Bryn M. Reeves <bmr@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Please use %{buildroot} over ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} so that paths are consistently evaluated through the macro engine.

For consistency it would be nice if the Fedora Packaging Guidelines picked a
side on this. The current text reads:

"There is very little value in choosing one style over the other, since they
will resolve to the same values in all scenarios. You should pick a style and
use it consistently throughout your packaging."

 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_using_buildroot_and_optflags_vs_rpm_build_root_and_rpm_opt_flags

The RPM Packaging Guide does express a preference (for the same reason you
give), but hasn't been updated in over two years and lacks any discussion of
%generate_buildrequires and other newer features:

  https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/

> This is a spec build section that runs after %prep and before %build, so please consider placing it there in the spec file too.

Thanks. I was lead astray by the Python example at:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires#Python

Which places the %generate_buildrequires after the BuildRequires. Even reading:

  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros

It's not clearly stated where these should go (other than an example under the
provisional Declarative Buildsystem section) - I should have referred to the
examples in:

  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357266

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202357266%23c25

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux