https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358883 --- Comment #12 from Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > That said, do you *really* need version 0.7 of bitfield-struct, or could you patch what you're working on to build with version 0.10? > Patches like that are usually gladly accepted by upstream projects, and it's better to not create too many compat packages, they just create additional maintenance burden for versions of crates that are almost always no longer maintained upstream. Upstream igvm is already using version 0.10, but has not been released yet. SVSM, on the other hand, is using 0.6.2 but bumping the version seems to work just fine. So yes, we can use 0.10 directly and I guess we can close this review request. Thanks everybody for the feedback! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358883 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202358883%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
