https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354972 --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sandro from comment #8) > Now I wonder if "transformed in some way (for example, by compilation)" > applies to header files. If not, unbundling the header file would not > strictly be required. But with this change, this becomes a question of > curiosity. > My understanding is that during compilation, the compiler replaces the contents of the `#include` statements with the complete contents of the referred files. So, header-only libraries (the used bits) will end up being compiled and as part of the generated binaries, which means their licensing needs to be taken into account. Does that make sense? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354972 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202354972%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
