[Bug 2262694] Review Request: materialx - Open standard for the exchange of rich material

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262694



--- Comment #60 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #58)
> > %bcond          viewer      0  # Graphical viewer (enabled by default)
> The comment seems confused.
Fixed.

> 
> > %{_libdir}/libMaterialX*.so.*
> The packaging guidelines say
> (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> #_listing_shared_library_files):
> > Shared libraries installed directly into %{_libdir} SHOULD NOT be listed in the
> > %files section of the spec by using a glob in a way that conceals important
> > parts of the file name (e.g. libfoo.so*)

Fixed with this line: "%{_libdir}/libMaterialX*.so.{1,%{version}}"
Before simplification, the old spec version had the following:
"
%{_libdir}/libMaterialXCore.so.{1,%{version}}
%{_libdir}/libMaterialXFormat.so.{1,%{version}}
%{_libdir}/libMaterialXGen{,Glsl,Mdl,Msl,Osl,Shader}.so.{1,%{version}}
%{_libdir}/libMaterialXRender{,Glsl,Hw,Osl}.so.{1,%{version}}
"

> 
> In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262694#c45 Ben noticed
> that bundled libraries are not handled properly and gave nanogui as an
> example.
> But https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262694#c41 lists many more
> bundled libraries. They need to be handled too. And please note that
> "handled properly" means that ideally the system version is used.

Re-include the line: "Provides:       bundled(nanogui) =
0.2.0^20221102gitf5020e2"
Currently, upstream cmake requires git submodule for nanogui hence left
disabled until
a proper fix occurs.


> At least glfw and catch are packaged.
Fixed with the following:
"BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(catch2)
BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(glfw3)"


> One more thing: the Summary says "open standard". That is rather misleading.
> A package that is described as a standard would normally be expected to
> contain
> the text of the standard or something like that. But it seems to provide
> a library that implements it or something like that, I didn't actualy look.

The summary is updated with the following line: "Vendor-neutral specification
for 3D material interchange"

Here is the updated
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@designsuite/blender/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08882889-materialx/materialx.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@designsuite/blender/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08882889-materialx/materialx-1.39.3-1.fc43.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262694

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202262694%23c60

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux