https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358292 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx CC| |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hm, the data/* files exclusively contain generated code, not "data" per se. Not sure *what* they're generated from, but it doesn't look like the code for generating these files is part of the published crate, which would be a violation of the rules here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#pregenerated-code And I'm a little bit unsure whether we've already encountered issues with endianness in API calls like this one? > zerovec::ZeroVec::from_bytes_unchecked(b"am\0ar\0as\0balbe\0bg\0bgcbhobn\0brxchrcswcv...") -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358292 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202358292%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
