https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346427 --- Comment #12 from Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Ahh yeah, the overload module is used via an eval, probably why it's missed. Added a manual Requires:. I also saw the rpmlint bit about the address, didn't think I should go editing somebody else's license, so I left it alone. If I get some time, I'll try to summarize the bit about %{_fixperms} and coreutils and ask fedora-devel's opinion (since the perl packages appear to be split about half and half). Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cmadams/perl-X-Tiny/perl-X-Tiny-0.22-4.fc41.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346427 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202346427%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
