https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346427 --- Comment #9 from Michal Josef Spacek <mspacek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-X-Tiny-0.22-3.fc43.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(constant) 1 perl-libs 1 perl(Module::Runtime) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) There is missing perl(overload) for run time. Probably not detected by perl-generator $ rpm -qp --provides perl-X-Tiny-0.22-3.fc43.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(X::Tiny::Base) 1 perl(X::Tiny) = 0.22 1 perl-X-Tiny = 0.22-3.fc43 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-X-Tiny* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 12 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.7 s There is funny rpm lint issue: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/perl-X-Tiny/LICENSE I don't know what about it. In case of coreutils, you are right. Delivering of macro should be dependency to coreutils, ideally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346427 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202346427%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
