https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354797 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The Spec URL does not point an spec file. It's some HTML file. I will continue the review with a specfile from the SRPM package. FIX: The Source0 address is missing an URL to the upstream archive. What's a provenance of the archive? Has the upstream released 0.5.5 version? Is the archive a snapshot of the upstream git tree? Is it a snapshot of a commit before 0.5.5 version or after the version? Could you please use Version and Release field in a form recommended by <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots>? Could you please add URL to Source0 field according to <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_forges_hosted_revision_control>? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354797 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202354797%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
