https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2352883 --- Comment #11 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/review/plutosvg.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/review/plutosvg-0.0.6-1.fc43.src.rpm(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #10) > perhaps rename the files to plutosvg2png, plutoemoji2png and plutocamera2png, Done. I'm not a fan of this, it's just samples and 99% of the users will never install them, I think they should be left as conflicting or there should be a policty to have them in "private" subfolder (ex. /usr/libexec/%{name}). > b) Is it possible to add a brief explanation above each patch explaining > what it does? Done. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2352883 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202352883%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
