https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353415 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Obsoletes: libgstroke < %{version}-%{release} > Provides: libgstroke = %{version}-%{release} > Obsoletes: libgstroke-devel < %{version}-%{release} > Provides: libgstroke-devel = %{version}-%{release} The provides should be archful, i.e. "Provides: libgstroke%{?_isa}". > %package doc > Summary: Documentation files for the %{name} library Remove the double space before "%{name}". > %package devel > Summary: Development files for the libstroke library This seems a bit inconsistent. ;) > %package -n javastroke > Summary: Optional java files > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > Buildarch: noarch Since this is a noarch package, the requirement should be arch-less. Otherwise you'll end up with the noarch package requiring whichever architecture the package builder used. Same issue on the -doc subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353415 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202353415%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
