https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534 --- Comment #21 from wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #18) > I'm still not sure what it brings you to have the source package name be > "awatcher" but the package that users actually install be "aw-awatcher". > It's a source package that builds one single binary package. Making their > names different just creates complications. But if this is a hill you want > to die on, that's fine, I guess ... Thanks. I just stick with the naming of the upstream project. One can not go bad with that. Should some more watchers appear in the future under the name "awatcher", then I wouldn't have to rename the source package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202344534%23c21 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
