https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344119 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Sure, if it will get reviewed quickly enough. I'll do my best. ;) > OK to do pre-merge? (FRS CI won't succeed yet because it runs in COPR, which lags rawhide and won't have the side tags I'm using for the stable branches.) I don't think there's a difference in dependencies between 0.13.4 and 0.13.5, so if one fails in fedora-review-service build, the other one will to. > AFAICS rust2rpm does not create these, and the only modifications I made to the rust2rpm generated .spec file was to fill in the output of %cargo_license_summary. Can that Provides be automated? No, it cannot be automated. I added them to existing packages I maintain as a convenience for users who expect the package name to match the upstream project's name (which is not usually the case for GStreamer plugins). It would be nice if the plugins from gst-plugins-rs were consistent in this regard, but it's not a hard requirement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344119 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202344119%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
