[Bug 2352880] Review Request: plutovg - Tiny 2D vector graphics library in C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2352880



--- Comment #6 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> a) Please list the binary smiley in %{_bindir} rather than globbing, it may
> cause collisions if it changes

Done.

> b) Additional licenses seem to be used:
> Freetype Project License
> ------------------------
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/FTL.TXT
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-math.c
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-math.h
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-raster.c
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-raster.h
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-stroker.c
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-stroker.h
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-ft-types.h
> 
> MIT License
> -----------
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/LICENSE
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/include/plutovg.h
> 
> MIT License and/or The Unlicense
> --------------------------------
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-stb-image-write.h
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-stb-image.h
> plutovg-1.0.0-build/plutovg-1.0.0/source/plutovg-stb-truetype.h

Fixed, changed to MIT AND FTL, as unlicense is an optional.

> c) A newer version of stb is in Fedora:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stb
> If the one in Fedora cannot be used, may wish to ask upstream to update to
> the newer version and also indicates the bundled stb as a provides in the
> spec file.

Done, patched to use system stb.

> d) Please remove the rpath or perhaps do not package smiley the example
> application

Done, I added the install of the samples to the meson.build file, that takes
care of stripping the path on install. It also simplifies the SPEC file.

> e) Builds on all architectures
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=130395014

This is already fine?

> f) As a smoke test consider running the smiley binary

Good idea. I added it along with some comment.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2352880

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202352880%23c6

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux