https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332598 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry for the delay in getting back to this. > Shouldn't that be reflected at this line For purposes of Fedora packaging, this is true. But not everyone subscribes to the same school of thought on that topic as Red Hat Legal does. I have filed an upstream issue to clarify this. But for downstream packaging, the patch should already correctly reflect the project license(s). https://github.com/mattico/elasticlunr-rs/issues/55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332598 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202332598%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
