[Bug 2349303] Review Request: python-safetensors - Python bindings for the safetensors library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2349303



--- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I haven’t read through the whole package or the whole review, but just a couple
of contributions:

(In reply to Tom.Rix from comment #5)
> Why isn't this just ?
> 
> License: Apache-2.0
> 
> I do not think it is necessary include
> 
> %license bindings/python/LICENSE.dependencies
> 
> As you are not bundling these packages 

Rust dependencies are statically linked, so their licenses (based on the output
of %{cargo_license_summary} during a build) MUST be included in the License
tags of the binary RPMs:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/#_license_tags

> python3-safetensors+numpy:
> python3-safetensors+torch:
> 
> These I think are overkill, reduce to just python3-safetensors, even if it
> means
> needed to manually add
> 
> Requires: python3dist(numby)
> Requires: python3dist(torch)

These extras matapackages are the right way to package Python extras:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_handling_extras

Simply adding the dependencies as extra Requires has some issues:

- Things that don’t require the optional functionality associated with the
extra would then bring in unnecessary dependencies – and python3-torch is HUGE.
- This would *not* be able to satisfy Python dependencies that actually require
the extras, like python3dist(safetensors[numpy]). Only the metapackages furnish
the appropriate Provides.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2349303

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202349303%23c6

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux