https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #5 from Claire Robsahm <inquiries@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Artur Frenszek-Iwicki from comment #4) > > Understood. Do I list each license on a separate line? > Putting multiple "License: XXX" tags on a single package is invalid > and will cause rpmbuild to refuse to build the package and exit with an > error, > so the licences must all go in a single "License: XXX and YYY..." tag. > (Unless you're building multiple packages from the same spec file, > in which case each sub-package can have a different licence tag.) > > That being said, standard practice is to also put a comment explaining the > licensing breakdown. > You should end up with something like: > > # Most of the code is subject to license XXX. > # - src/linked_list.c is licensed under YYY > # Statically linked library "qwerty" is ZZZ. > License: XXX and YYY and ZZZ Fixed. I also switched to using %autorelease, I was using manual build numbers for my own testing. SPEC URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/openmw.spec SRPM URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/SRPMS/openmw-0.49.0-1.fc42.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202379721%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ Fedora Games SIG mailing list -- games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to games-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
