Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28 2025 at 07:04:37 PM -00:00:00, Leigh Scott > leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Have you filed a change proposal for this? > > No. Orphaning packages surely does not require a change proposal. > Actually, we don't even have permission to orphan packages. Only the > package owner can actually orphan a package. My plan is to just email > the maintainers to suggest they consider orphaning them. We'll also > remove gnome-sig's access permissions from the package. What actually > happens to each package is up to the package owner. > > and is the target for this F44? > > We were planning to do this next week. Any packages that get retired as > a result of this would still be present in F43 since it has branched. You could have worded your initial post better, using the term orphan was misleading and caused confusion, I will take gnome-screenshot if mclasen has finished with it :-} -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
