Hi there This takes possible RHEL/EPEL friction to a new level. We're used to packages which are built for RHEL but shipped partially only (libs without devel). "Moving" a package from EPEL to RHEL, i.e. shipping it in RHEL and thus forcing it out of EPEL, and then dumping some of the arches is really a new level of unnecessary surprises. Thanks for reporting the issue! Michael Mikel Olasagasti venit, vidit, dixit 2025-08-29 13:34:15: > Hi Federico, > > python-colorama has been included in RHEL and retired from EPEL. It's > part of awscli's dependency chain and as awscli is only built for > x86_64 and aarch64 RHEL only ships dependencies for those > architectures. Issue has been reported to Red Hat in > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-96267 > > Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391489#c3 for more details. > > Best regards, > Mikel Olasagasti > > Hau idatzi du Federico Pellegrin (fede@xxxxxxxxxxxx) erabiltzaileak > (2025 abu. 29(a), or. (13:23)): > > > > > > > > Hello, > > I'm having some difficulties to understand a failure on Koji on Fedora EPEL10 and was wondering if someone could maybe help me, as I did a few tries but couldn't figure out if I'm doing something wrong (and especially, due to seemingly depending on the arch, I cannot reproduce with mockbuild or similar local tools). > > > > The failure is this one for example: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136495437 > > > > It is a Python package, which requires tox. It seems to work fine for x86_64 and aarch64, but for ppc and s390 seems to be missing a dependency python3.12dist(colorama) which as far as I see should be even noarch (and is found in the x86_64 and aarch64 builds). Colorama is from 10 not anymore in EPEL but went to the base distro I understand. > > > > But if I check (assuming I got it right the AppStream repo used) indeed I find it here: > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/centos/centos-10/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/ > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/centos/centos-10/AppStream/aarch64/os/Packages/ > > > > but not here in the two failing arch: > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/centos/centos-10/AppStream/ppc64le/os/Packages/ > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/centos/centos-10/AppStream/s390x/os/Packages/ > > > > Is it a bug in AppStream itself therefore? > > > > Many thanks! > > Federico > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
