Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Steffan
<jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 8:36 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It is possible to request Fedora to sign it. You will probably need to make some packaging changes to support it, but it can be done.
>
>
> Ah cool. I didn't know that we had made any progress on upgrading the signing process and adding our own keys. I've tried following the discussions.
>
> I assume end-users will still have to enroll an additional key?
> Are we enrolling keys automatically, on first boot or otherwise?
>
> Will this work with Grub or is it just for sd-boot?
>

It would be signed with the standard Fedora key, so it should work
from any boot manager that loads shim to activate the Fedora key.

> Are the packaging changes needed documented anywhere?
>

No, though btrfs-efi is a decent example:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/btrfs-efi



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux