On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 15:16 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 06:32:44 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro > <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > OK, so I missed a bunch of packages where action is required. This is > > why it's better to work in rawhide first. Do as I say, not as I do. I > > think the path of least resistance here is for me to add Provides in > > addition to the Obsoletes, so we don't have to run around trying to > > drop the dependencies all over the place to fix uninstallable > > packages after beta freeze. That should do the trick. > > Done. > > So, with Provides in place, there should now be almost no impact on > user experience as the change is transparent. EXCEPT: you do need to > install glycin-thumbnailer to replace gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer. I've > added that package to gnome-desktop group in comps. However, I suspect > other spins may also have been relying on this thumbnailer. This should > be the only thing you need to do in order to ensure users don't notice > the change. Are there not Obsoletes: in place? If not, how is this expected to work for GNOME users on upgrade? -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
