thanks. pls ignore the permission part --- it seems related to the fact that I did the work in a docker, something happened during the srpm creations.
Regards!
Yonghang
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:26 AM Yonghang Wang <wyhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi team,Could you help advise what I need for this review? thanks.in review template,1. For the license part, now all files in the prep'd directory have a license. Or all files within the source tarball should have a license --- means I will need preprocessing until upstream applies the same as well?2. I have no idea about the warnings below. They have normal permissions in source tarball.```seergdb.src: W: strange-permission add_copyrights_to_source_files.patch 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission add_spdx_license_to_markdowns.patch 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb-2.5.tar.gz 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.1 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.metainfo.xml 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.spec 666```3. Anything I can do from the maintainer's side?
Regards!
Yonghang
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
