On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:19 PM Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I > went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the need for > libatomic_ops there. Upstream discourages the use of libatomic_ops in > new(er) projects, because better alternatives exist in form of C11 or C+ > +14 standard atomics. > > With those PRs applied > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pulseaudio/pull-request/15 > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rakudo/pull-request/22 > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/moarvm/pull-request/21 > libatomic_ops will become a leaf package and can be considered > deprecated. There is no plan to retire it in the near future as it's > still maintained upstream. See also the documentation here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/#_prerequisites_for_deprecation So you can mark the package as "officially" deprecated if there are no dependent packages left without paperwork. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
