On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 6:35 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 03:05:11 AM -05:00:00, Benjamin Gilbert
<bgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One option is to remove all loaders from gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra
> except XPM, at least in Rawhide.
I recommend doing this. Then we can see if anybody complains about the
other missing loaders.
Done in F44; I'll leave F43 as is. I looked through the reverse deps' dist-gits and any linked BZs, and none of them report a specific need for anything other than BMP, PPM, or XPM.
If Glycin rejects XPM, then another option is to reenable XPM in the
main gdk-pixbuf2 package. Although that might not be the *best* option,
because that will fail if the code gets deleted upstream in the future,
which seems possible. With gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra as a separate
source package, you could stay on older upstream package version
forever if that happens.
Yeah, the separate source package seems best. Any packages that need XPM have presumably gained a -modules-extra dependency by now.
--Benjamin Gilbert
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
