Re: [HEADS-UP] dracut 108 in Fedora Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:01 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think the expectation was for dracut 108 and systemd 258 to be used in tandem.

The changes for dracut 108 are significant, and
clearly could break something in F43, but I think
getting it into F43 would be for the best rather
than waiting for F44.  Would this need to be a
late F43 FESCo change exception, or could it
be a beta freeze exception?  I don't really like
either choice, but this would seem to be the
time to make a decision.
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux