Dear Florian,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:11 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That said, I am not sure they are changing all symbol versions in the
> new .so.4 file, perhaps they should reset all symbols versions to
> 4.0.0?
Yeah, if they don't do that, it's going to be really awkward.
How set are they on the soname bump? Maybe they'd be open to a review
how to avoid it on GNU/Linux? But that could mean they'll end up with
different sonames on GNU and musl.
I think that it's worth asking upstream [1] about it. Either feature request or discussion would work.
Dmitry Belyavskiy
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
