On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 04:10:36PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > On 8/5/25 1:01 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > FHS, even version 3, has mostly missed the evolution of Linux systems > > that has happened in the last few decades. In particular, it > > completely missed the usr-merge, and obviously the merge of bin and > > sbin… Just looking at the contents table, it is full of outdated > > stuff, it talks about /mnt and /media, without the understanding that > > *temporary* paths need to go under /run instead of polluting the root > > file system. > > Funny you should mention that, I just reported a bug with 'filesystem' > updates > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386469 > > when there's something mounted RO on /mnt. I used /mnt to temporarily mount > an external drive, and the package wanted to use it for something during the > update. Is /mnt somehow reserved for the system? I replied in the bug, copying my answer here too: > I guess what is happening is that rpm tries to adjust the mode of > /mnt as described in the package, and there's VFAT mounted on /mnt, > and that fails as unsupported. > > Since /mnt *is* supposed to be used like this, I think it'd make > sense to change the entry to be %noverify or %ghost or something > like that to make that case work. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
