* Dan Horák: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 08:40:14 +0200 > Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote: >> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200 >> > Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > So there was a 64-bit instruction bundle at the patched offset, and that >> > may have been the reason why ucx failed to patch properly. >> >> >> Thanks - is this already being tracked somewhere? > > https://github.com/openucx/ucx/issues/10780 Also requested a way to disable the runtime patching altogether: Provide a way to disable run-time glibc patching at build time <https://github.com/openucx/ucx/issues/10781> Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
