On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:08 AM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's the same question as Chris asked, effectively. If you can identify > the packages to revert them, you could just as easily skip them > instead. The answer is 'maybe, but it's not trivial'. > > Note the correct requirement is not just 'successfully built', but > 'reached stable'. Ok, it just seemed to be possibly easier since asking if the package (before the rpmdev-bumpspec) was already in stable at the existing dist would seem to be scriptable. Not having looked at the mass rebuild scripts, I accept I am mistaken about the trivialness of this random approach. Thanks. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
