Re: F43 Change Proposal: Hardlink identical files in packages by default (self-contained)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 28/07/2025 14.19, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:38 AM Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd rather we show extra care towards Fedora developers who are still
using Fedora, if there are any.  If we make Fedora development overly
complicated compared to working in a completely different environment or
distro, people may migrate (I'd argue that's not good for Fedora).


You have thousands or tens of thousands of hardlinked files in /usr today.
See:
find /usr -links +1 -type f

Not that I disagree with you... but all files have 1 link (themselves),
so that doesn't do what you thought it does.  You mean "+2", not "+1".

The original was correct.  The find manual has this:
       +n     for greater than n,
so in the original command, the test is for more than one link, not one or more.

--
Sjoerd Mullender

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux